Various Small Decisions and Milk, 2021

In my first post about discovering the artists' books collection at UNC Greensboro, I mentioned that along with the artists' books in special collections, I have often come across artists' books which are housed in Jackson Library's circulating collections. I discovered some of them by searching in the library's online catalog for the call number for artists' books specimens, which is N7433.4. I have found others by using the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), press names, or other links listed within the catalog record. And I have found yet others by searching artists' names I discovered by reading various articles and books about artists' books. 

Arrows indicate links to other resources in the same categories

One of the many things I learned as I was first searching in the catalog is that there are books which fall under the LCSH category "artists' books" as well as a heading for "artists' books specimens". Items in the former category might include reference books, exhibition catalogs, or other books about artists' books. Items in the latter category are the actual artists' books. It would be so neat and tidy if I could stop there because no further explanation of the organization of artists' books in libraries was necessary. However, as mentioned in my previous post, artists' books are not only housed with other artists' books. In fact, they might be found collocated with poetry, children's literature, photography, folk tales, history, or any number of other subject areas. Finding them, for me anyway, has been one lovely treasure hunt, especially in a year when we all needed a little more joy in our days.

When I do have a lucky find in the library's circulating collections, I almost immediately launch into an ongoing internal debate about whether or not those books should be transferred to Special Collections and University Archives (SCUA) or if they should stay right where they are. If my goal is to promote the preservation and access of artists' books, then moving the books to SCUA should facilitate their long-term preservation as the storage conditions are more closely monitored and the books would be secured. Therein lies the cause of my debate - the impact on access for students and researchers. If the artists' books are in the circulating collections, there is somewhat more opportunity to serendipitously find them. Likewise, ready access to the books allows students and researchers to pull the books they are interested in without the need to work with a librarian. One could argue though that ensuring the safe storage of the books is also ensuring that they can be accessed long-term. Books in SCUA can more easily be monitored and cared for, and researchers can request to see them at anytime during SCUA's open hours. Also, the artists' books in SCUA are likely to be shared with students regularly and purposefully rather than sitting on a shelf waiting to be discovered. If the date due stamps are any indication (and they are not always the most accurate measure of use), many of the books have been sitting on a shelf for a very long time. By moving them to SCUA, they will regularly be used with classes and in exhibitions.

A listing online for the same edition held by UNCG

Another interesting aspect of the books I discovered in the circulating collections is that some of them are now quite valuable. For example, we had a copy of Ed Ruscha's Various Small Fires and Milk, 1964 that was housed in the circulating collections. The book mostly consists of a series of photographs of fires followed by one last image of milk. At the time of its first printing, it likely sold for just a few dollars. Now, copies of that book online range in price from about $600 to $7500 depending on the edition, condition, and whether it is signed by the artist. Even if our copy fell at the bottom of that range, it represents one of several books of Ruscha's that I found in the circulating collections. Determining the value of a book is not in my wheelhouse of expertise, but I believe I can confidently surmise that our copy is now worth much more than the $2-3 it sold for in the 1960s or 1970s.

That said, our copy does have one factor that may decrease its value financially (it is arguably still valuable in terms of its research potential or aesthetic properties). Our copy was in a library binding. UNCG obtained our copy of the book in 1970 and at that time, and sometimes still, it was considered best practice to put a small paperback book in a sturdier cover so that it will last through all the handling and use it may endure over the years. In this case, the library binding consisted of one side of a double-stitched binder's tape being adhered to the spine of the book and new paper endsheets, and the other side was attached to a custom-fitted cover made of book board and a strip of bookbinding cloth.

Library bindings like this one were, and sometimes still are, considered a
best practice for preserving the life of the book for the long-term

Author Gay Walker noted in her 1982 article about library binding, "The growth of the reading public in the early and mid-nineteenth century placed tremendous pressures on the book industry. This push for increased output forced changes in both paper manufacturing and binding methods... [paperbacks] have fallen apart from wear and tear and the failure of poor materials used in the original binding." So, a book like Various Small Fires was never built to endure the type of use it may encounter in a busy research library. "Library binding may be viewed as a conservation measure if the life of the book is extended through such protection and the option to rebind in the future is maintained." (Walker, 1982) In fact, our copy is in as good of condition as it is because of the forethought of the bindery employee who put it in a library binding.

Left: Paper endsheet attached to front cover of a paperback
Right: Adding moisture to soften the adhesive to remove the endsheet

Since the book would now be transferred to SCUA and likely to be used with classes or in exhibitions, I needed to consider whether to leave it in the library binding or to attempt to restore it to as close to its original condition as possible. On one had, it would create a more authentic experience for the reader if the book looked like it did originally. On the other hand, it likely was not going to be possible to get it out of the library binding completely unscathed. Walker warned thirty years ago, "Valuable books should be handled separately from those in the normal commercial binding routines, particularly if special options are not available from the binder." However, remember that this book did not necessarily fall into the category of "valuable books" when it was first obtained, so providing a library binding that would be reversible (a basic tenet of any conservation treatment) was not really a mandate.

Left: Using a metal spatula to gently remove the remaining adhesive
Right: A view of the spine released from the double-stitched binder's tape

If we were fortunate to have two copies of the book, one could remain in pristine condition and the other, perhaps in a library binding, could be a handling copy for students and researchers. Because we only have the one copy, I had to decide whether it made sense to attempt to remove it from the library binding, though I still have mixed feelings about whether or not that is the best course of action in similar situations in the future. My strong inclination was to attempt to restore it to as close to its original condition as possible, so I did ultimately remove it from the library binding along with several other artists' books that were in library bindings. Photographs of that process are included in this post.

If you would like to continue to follow along with my journey of discovering the artists' books at UNCG, please subscribe to this blog for updates.

Various Small Fires and Milk was removed from the library binding.
It later received a thin, matching mending tissue over the spine area

_______________________

Walker, G. (1982). Library Binding as a Conservation Measure. Collection Management, 4(1-2), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1300/j105v04n01_04